MADISON, Wisconsin (Associated Press) – President Donald Trump’s extraordinary effort to nullify Joe Biden’s victory in Wisconsin returned to the courtroom on Thursday, as hearings in federal and state lawsuits seek to nullify hundreds of thousands of ballots and grant the legislative power he controls. The Republican Party has the right to vote. The Power to Name Trump the Winner.
Trump’s lawyers are urging the courts to act quickly so that he can appeal any dissenting judgment before the Electoral College meeting On Monday, Wisconsin made 10 votes for Biden. Lawyers for Governor Tony Evers and the bipartisan government election commission say the cases are unfounded and should be dismissed.
The lawsuit made Wisconsin the only state that failed to meet the safe haven deadline on Tuesday, which means Congress will have to accept the electoral votes that will be cast on Monday and send them to the Capitol for a count on January 6. Lack of deadline would not disqualify Wisconsin from 10 of its electoral votes.
Biden won Wisconsin by 20,600 votes. Those approved results, which came after Trump ordered a recount in the two largest Democratic districts in the state, subsequently challenged Trump in the two cases he filed in Wisconsin.
Of the nearly 50 lawsuits filed across the country challenging the November 3 vote, Trump lost more than 35. The others are suspended, according to an Associated Press count.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has already refused to hear Trump’s case Once, saying that he must first pass the lower courts. However, the court will likely soon bring the case before it again.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court is controlled 4-3 by conservative judges. One of them, Judge Brian Hagidorn, three times joined the Liberals in deciding against Trump’s case, and two others were brought by Trump’s allies to cancel the election.
“The relief sought by the petitioners is the most dramatic protest of the judiciary I have ever seen,” Hagidorn wrote in his rejection of the Wisconsin Voter Alliance issue. This is a dangerous path that we are being asked to take. The loss of public confidence in our constitutional system resulting from the exercise of this type of judicial power will not be counted. “
Supreme Court Chief Justice Patience Roggensack, a conservative, said that voiding 221,000 votes, as Trump’s case seeks, “may be out of reach for a number of reasons.”
In the state’s case, Trump wants to disqualify absentia votes cast early and in person, saying there was no appropriate written request for ballot papers; Absentee ballot papers cast by persons claiming their “indefinite restricted” status; Absentee ballots collected by polling officers in Madison Gardens; And absentee ballot papers where scribes fill in missing information on ballot envelopes.
Trump’s federal lawsuit originally asked the court to “return” the case to the Republican-controlled legislature to select new voters who then vote for Trump on Monday. US District Court Judge Brett Ludwig last week described the request as “strange”.
After this comment, Trump amended his request to instead direct the governor to issue certification of results consistent with the appointment of voters appointed by the legislature. At a pre-trial conference on Wednesday, Ludwig described the request as “also strange”.
Trump claims that the elections were not conducted properly and that the risk of voter fraud increased because the ballot boxes were not staffed, mail voting was widely used, and voters who said they were locked up indefinitely were allowed to cast their absentee ballots without showing any vote. A valid ID card.
Trump-appointed Ludwig questioned last week whether the Federal Court was the right place for the case. The hearing begins at nine in the morning on Thursday. If it ends on time, state court will begin in the afternoon, but can continue until Friday. Swift judgments were expected in both cases.